Journal of Ophthalmic Science

Journal of Ophthalmic Science

Journal of Ophthalmic Science – Reviewer Guidelines

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript

Reviewer Guidelines

Standards and expectations for JOS peer reviewers.

Guardians of Scientific Quality

Reviewers are essential to maintaining JOS's reputation for rigorous ophthalmic research publishing.

Core Responsibilities
  • Evaluate manuscripts objectively for scientific validity and clinical merit
  • Complete reviews within 14-21 days
  • Declare any conflicts of interest before accepting
  • Maintain strict confidentiality of manuscript contents
  • Provide constructive, specific, and respectful feedback
Review Criteria

When evaluating an ophthalmic manuscript, consider:

  • Originality and significance of the clinical question
  • Appropriateness of study design and methodology
  • Quality of clinical images and data presentation
  • Clarity and logical flow of presentation
  • Clinical applicability and patient care implications
Ethical Conduct

Reviewers must adhere to COPE guidelines. Do not use ideas or data from manuscripts under review for personal benefit.

Questions About Reviewing?

Contact Editorial