Reviewer Register
We welcome reviewers with expertise in alternative medicine, integrative health, and mind body practices.
Provide clear keywords to support accurate assignment.
Reviewer Profile Overview
Reviewers help maintain high standards in integrative health research. Provide detailed expertise so manuscripts are matched effectively to your knowledge area.
Clear availability information helps the editorial office manage review timelines and distribute workload fairly.
Expertise Match
Accurate keywords improve assignment
Balanced Load
Availability supports timely decisions
Quality Feedback
Constructive reviews strengthen outcomes
Profile Details
- Current affiliation and contact details
- Areas of expertise and methodological skills
- Recent publications or clinical experience
- Availability and preferred review load
Expertise Examples
- Mind body interventions and meditation research
- Acupuncture and traditional healing systems
- Herbal medicine and natural products
- Integrative oncology and chronic disease care
- Health policy and wellness programs
Commitment
Reviewers should respond promptly to invitations and complete reviews within agreed timelines.
Reviewers are expected to provide constructive, unbiased assessments and to disclose any conflicts of interest.
How to Register
Send a brief profile and CV to the editorial office with your expertise keywords and preferred review topics. The team will confirm your profile and invite you to review when matches arise.
Reviewer Workflow
Profile review
Editorial office confirms expertise match
Invitation
Review requests sent based on topic fit
Review
Provide constructive feedback within timeline
Recognition
Service documented for professional records
Eligibility and Expectations
Reviewers should have recent publication or clinical experience in integrative health, mind body practices, or complementary therapies. Experience with study design or statistical analysis is valued.
Commitment to Timelines
Reviewers are asked to confirm availability promptly and complete reviews within the agreed timeframe. Timely feedback supports author progress and editorial efficiency.
Conflicts and Confidentiality
Reviewers must keep manuscripts confidential and disclose any conflicts of interest before accepting an assignment.
Clear, constructive reviews help authors improve methods and reporting while supporting editorial decisions.
The editorial office may request updates to expertise areas to keep assignments accurate.
Prompt communication helps ensure efficient reviewer matching.
Providing specific keywords improves topic alignment.
Accurate profiles help distribute workload fairly.
Updates keep matches precise.
Submit Your Reviewer Profile
Share your expertise and availability with the editorial office.
